David Haye, the previous cruiserweight champion, has referred to his challenger as a Freak, The ugliest mania I have yet seen, pose with cardboard cut-outs of the boxer then to behead the cardboard copy. Whilst all this has be done in the Muhammad Ali method of pre-fight publicity, one significant word has been gone out of the Haye Arsenal Easy.

Valuev, it be supposed to not be forgotten, was on the in receipt of end of an very fortunate decision next to the 44yr old Evander Holyfield, the same Holyfield who was given important losses by both previous cruiserweight James Toney and the Russian Sultan Ibragimov. His own place as the WBA champion is certainly questionable, before we even go into into the merits of the Hayemaker’s place in the WBA rankings.
Who has David Haye flattened, at moreover Cruiserweight or Heavyweight, to be clever to be so hateful towards his opponent. The fact is the only standout name on his evidence is the big success of Frenchman Jean-Marc Mormeck in Paris. Mormeck, with his well recognized stamina issue, had given Haye a atrocious lesson in speed and authority before his common tiring in the later rounds.

WBA heavyweight winner Nikolai Valuev is a sluggish, one dimensional, technically limited boxer. Whilst I am no admirer of David Haye, if he can’t beat the likes of Valuev he has no trade in the superior tier of heavyweight boxing.

Whatever the result of this clash, one thing is certain; neither boxer has the aptitude to challenge either Klitschko. Haye and Valuev would both lose determinedly to either Wladimir or Vitali, and this meeting as a name clash is a damning indictment on the present condition of the Heavyweight list. Furthermore, Haye is at risk of further alienate himself from right boxing fans with his not only his be short of of respect for his adversary but also his increase to power, despite his be short of of pedigree in his new separation.